Problem identification process
The completion of this step of the Framework should result in clear statements of problems and documented evidence of their scale and extent, causes and effects, the cost of the problem and priority.
However, the process by which EALs will be determined is not specified. It might be appropriate to derive EALs for specific contaminants from existing water-quality criteria, but available databases on biological-effect thresholds are not suited to FWS purposes.
Combining existing research and information from your stakeholders can offer some insight into the problem and its causes. They originally thought it was a health care problem, but in reality, it was a transportation problem.
Problems can be different for the various planning levels. After reading, you will understand the basics of this powerful problem solving method.
Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Why is it important to solve the problem? Data from CDC show the scope of teen drinking and driving at the national and state levels and breaks it down by demographic.
Problem identification tools
Doing this can also help you identify any gaps in the data you have gathered. Sampling will be biased toward sites where contaminant impacts are believed to exist; this is reasonable and cost-effective, given the focus of identifying specific contaminant problems and locations on each refuge. A couple of mapping techniques can be used to undertake this exercise. Domestic Violence is the area of interest for researcher. Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. Second, the types and causes of variability in ecosystems differ on different scales. Step III: Selecting the Sub area of Interest: After identifying the possible sub-area, the researcher selects the sub area of interest. To provide useful information on impacts of toxic substances, the program must be able to distinguish between natural and human-induced sources of variability and between variability due to contaminants and other human impacts. As Table suggests, the committee believes that the status-and-trends components of the program will be much easier to implement for FWS's existing wildlife-refuge system than for habitats of wide-ranging trust species. A rationale for the status and trends of key-species habitats component of the program is provided on p. Problem Solving Chart 1. The detailed plan provides no rationale for selecting specific indicators at different sites or for integrating information from different indicators.
based on 1 review