Peer reviewed scientific articles

There are generally four methods for doing this Limiting a database search to peer-reviewed journals only.

Peer reviewed scientific articles

Keywords: Scientific writing, peer-review, article, publication, publishing Introduction The contribution of peer-reviewers is invaluable in scholarly publishing, science and medicine. For in-depth review, at least two outside referees are consulted. Find the official web site on the internet, and check to see if it states that the journal is peer-reviewed. In most cases the reviewers do not know who the author of the article is, so that the article succeeds or fails on its own merit, not the reputation of the expert. It is not fair to judge a manuscript only guided by impressions. Email: ti. Science now gives the opportunity for cross-review. Regarding the specific comments that you are willing to make about the article, disagreement is allowed, and often advisable, as long as its source is clearly disclosed and supported by objective data. This will also help the editor taking a sounder decision when reading your comments and prevent embarrassing replies by the authors. See the General Information for Authors Page. Helpful hint! This aspect is often under-recognized by some reviewers and may also cause problems to the editors.

If in doubt, ask your teacher or a librarian for assistance. If you have any professional or financial affiliations that may be perceived as a conflict of interest in reviewing the manuscript, or a history of personal differences with the author syou should describe them in your confidential comments.

nature journal

Received Nov 26; Accepted Nov If, as a reviewer, you believe that you are not qualified to evaluate a component of the research, you should inform the editor in your review.

Are the articles written by scholarly researchers in the field that the periodical pertains to? In such case, it is actually worthless to undertake a thoughtful revision of the manuscript, since it is unlikely that the conclusions of the study will contribute to improve the current scientific knowledge, and it may hence be advisable to limit your comments to a simple sentence stating that the novelty of the article is too low to recommend acceptance, or that the topic does not fit the scope of the journal.

The quality assessment of an article must be rigorous and meet a number of predefined criteria.

plos one

There may be other options e. The reviewer is not engaged in a battle with the authors, but is only asked to provide expert advice to the Editor of the journal, who is the one and only responsible for the final decision.

peer reviewed articles search engine
Rated 9/10 based on 113 review
Peer Review at Science Publications