There are generally four methods for doing this Limiting a database search to peer-reviewed journals only.
If in doubt, ask your teacher or a librarian for assistance. If you have any professional or financial affiliations that may be perceived as a conflict of interest in reviewing the manuscript, or a history of personal differences with the author syou should describe them in your confidential comments.
Received Nov 26; Accepted Nov If, as a reviewer, you believe that you are not qualified to evaluate a component of the research, you should inform the editor in your review.
Are the articles written by scholarly researchers in the field that the periodical pertains to? In such case, it is actually worthless to undertake a thoughtful revision of the manuscript, since it is unlikely that the conclusions of the study will contribute to improve the current scientific knowledge, and it may hence be advisable to limit your comments to a simple sentence stating that the novelty of the article is too low to recommend acceptance, or that the topic does not fit the scope of the journal.
The quality assessment of an article must be rigorous and meet a number of predefined criteria.
There may be other options e. The reviewer is not engaged in a battle with the authors, but is only asked to provide expert advice to the Editor of the journal, who is the one and only responsible for the final decision.